"The tall native grass growing along the bank on your block has been identified in Melbourne as Dichelachne hirtella, not even recorded for South Australia... so cherish that one... RB"
More here,
http://www.anbg.gov.au/cgi-bin/apx?taxon_id=64957
and here, which map does seem to have a record of it on the Flerieu Peninsula, hmmmm.
http://www.anbg.gov.au/cgi-bin/map/winmap?taxon_id=64957
http://tropicos.org/name/25557811
http://plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/cgi-bin/NSWfl.pl?page=nswfl&lvl=sp&name=Dichelachne~hirtella
... still looking ... oh!
GOLD!
http://www.kew.org/data/grasses-db/www/imp02783.htm
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
There seem to be two SA records from the same location. Here's the data acording to the Australian Virtual Herbarium. (Sorry about the formatting!)
ReplyDeleteSource institute NSW
Accession number 549621
Scientific name Dichelachne hirtella N.G.Walsh
Collector Salasoo, H.
Collecting number 1660
Collecting date 27-Dec-1958
Additional collectors
Country Australia
State South Australia
Near named place
Latitude -35.0
Longitude 138.67
Geocode source Compiler
Geocode precision 10000.0
Record update date 23-Nov-2006
Source institute CBG
Accession number 7800144
Scientific name Dichelachne hirtella N.G.Walsh
Collector Crisp, M.D.
Collecting number 3842
Collecting date 30-Dec-1977
Additional collectors
Country Australia
State South Australia
Near named place
Latitude -35.0
Longitude 138.67
Geocode source collector
Geocode precision 1000.0
Record update date 4-May-2004
Aaah, Thanks for that confirmation Snail :)
ReplyDeleteI have gone to the SA Herbarium site, which I think Bob would have consulted, and it seems not to have it recorded.
http://www.flora.sa.gov.au/index.html
"Census of South Australian Plants State Herbarium of South Australia
List of current names and synonyms for the search term Dichelachne hirtella
Final data modification on: Saturday 19 June 2010 2:15 AM
Web page created on: Sunday 20 June 2010 7:55 AM
ERROR: Your query found no matches. Please check the spelling, use wildcards, or be less specific."
I have checked the spelling, but can't rely on proof-reading my own efforts!